Robert Hu
All PostsE-commerce Strategy

Kroger's $400M E-Commerce Pivot: Closing Automated Centers for Store-Based Fulfillment

Robert Hu··8 min read
Kroger e-commerce fulfillment strategy pivoting from automated centers to store-based model

Updated February 2026

Kroger is closing three of its high-tech Ocado-powered automated fulfillment centers and taking a $2.6 billion impairment charge, pivoting toward a hybrid model of store-based fulfillment and third-party delivery partnerships. The move targets approximately $400 million in profitability improvements by 2026 and signals a fundamental rethinking of what infrastructure makes sense for profitable grocery e-commerce.

Despite reporting 16% e-commerce sales growth in Q2 2025 and five consecutive quarters of double-digit expansion, Kroger's e-commerce division remains unprofitable. The pivot is about changing that trajectory.

Why Is Kroger Closing Automated Fulfillment Centers?

Kroger is closing three Ocado-powered customer fulfillment centers because the facilities lacked sufficient order density to justify their operational costs. After a comprehensive review, Kroger concluded that massive centralized automation requires order volume that many markets simply do not have.

The three facilities slated for closure:

LocationOpenedStatus
Pleasant Prairie, WisconsinJune 2022Closing January 2025
Frederick, MarylandJune 2023Closing January 2025
Groveland, FloridaJune 2021Closing January 2025

The Ocado partnership launched in 2018 with high expectations. The companies envisioned a network of cutting-edge automated fulfillment centers that would revolutionize online grocery delivery. After opening several centers, Kroger paused new rollouts in 2023. While two additional centers in Charlotte and Phoenix are still planned for 2026, the closures represent a significant scaling back of the original vision.

Want help applying this to your brand?

Book a free 15-minute strategy session →

The Store-Based Alternative

Rather than centralized mega-fulfillment centers, Kroger is betting on capital-light, store-based automation in high-volume markets. This approach leverages existing infrastructure: stores are already paying rent, employing staff, and receiving inventory. Adding fulfillment capabilities becomes an incremental cost rather than a massive capital investment.

The economics are compelling:

  • Store-based fulfillment serves local demand with faster delivery times
  • Avoids the fixed costs of dedicated facilities
  • Customers in markets losing center coverage shift to pickup or delivery from nearby stores
  • Micro-fulfillment systems integrated into stores scale with demand rather than requiring massive upfront bets

I see this as a validation of what Walmart has been proving with its own store-based model: physical assets can be digital advantages when the fulfillment strategy matches the market density.

Embracing the Platform Economy

Perhaps the most revealing aspect of Kroger's pivot is its deepening embrace of third-party delivery platforms. Rather than owning the entire customer experience end-to-end, Kroger is partnering with established players who have already solved last-mile delivery.

PartnerRoleKey Feature
InstacartPrimary delivery providerAI-powered shopping assistant
DoorDashDelivery from ~2,700 storesExpanded coverage
UberGrowing partnershipLaunch early 2026

Instacart's AI shopping assistant, piloted within Kroger's mobile app, represents a bet that conversational commerce could increase basket sizes and frequency without Kroger building the AI infrastructure itself.

What Does Kroger's Pivot Mean for Grocery E-Commerce?

Kroger's strategic reset offers four lessons for the grocery e-commerce industry:

  • Automation is not one-size-fits-all: Massive centralized automation requires density that many markets lack. Store-based micro-fulfillment may be more scalable for most retailers.
  • Own what differentiates, partner for the rest: Kroger is choosing to own product, stores, and customer relationships while outsourcing last-mile delivery and AI shopping to specialists.
  • Profitability over growth: Taking a $2.6B charge to improve profitability by $400M annually signals a clear shift from growth-at-any-cost to disciplined economics.
  • AI as the new competitive frontier: While pulling back on physical automation, Kroger is leaning into AI-powered shopping experiences via Instacart, suggesting software-driven personalization may deliver better ROI than robotic warehouses.

The Road Ahead

The grocery industry is watching closely. If Kroger achieves its $400M profitability target by 2026, expect other retailers to follow this hybrid model. The playbook that is emerging: start with store-based fulfillment as the default, add dedicated automation only in proven high-density markets, partner with delivery platforms rather than building proprietary last-mile networks, and leverage AI to increase basket sizes through better personalization.

Kroger's $2.6B write-down is painful, but it may be the price of avoiding an even costlier strategic dead end. Sometimes the best path forward requires acknowledging what is not working and having the courage to change course.

If you are navigating fulfillment and marketplace strategy decisions like these, an e-commerce strategy consultation can help you evaluate which models fit your market. For more on how Amazon is approaching the same challenge differently, see the breakdown of Amazon's Project Cremini.

Related Service

E-commerce Strategy

A clear growth plan built around your specific catalog, margins, and market position.

Learn more

Want Help With This?

15 minutes. No pitch. Just honest strategy for your brand.

View Service